AI Code Refactoring at Scale
The Problem
Large refactors are dreaded because they're all-or-nothing. A single developer touching hundreds of files creates a monster PR that's impossible to review, and the branch goes stale before it's merged. Splitting the work manually is tedious and error-prone.
How Stoneforge solves it
AI code refactoring with Stoneforge makes large refactors tractable by decomposing them into a dependency graph of small, focused tasks — then executing automated refactoring in parallel across multiple agents.
Plan the refactor, don’t just start
The worst refactors start with git checkout -b big-refactor and end three weeks later with a 200-file PR. Stoneforge’s approach is different: the Director agent analyzes the refactoring goal and produces a structured plan.
# Describe what you want to refactor
sf plan create --title "Migrate from Express to Hono"
# The Director breaks it into ordered tasks:
# 1. Add Hono dependency and shared middleware adapter
# 2. Migrate /api/auth routes (no deps on other routes)
# 3. Migrate /api/users routes (parallel with auth)
# 4. Migrate /api/billing routes (parallel)
# 5. Update error handling middleware (depends on 1)
# 6. Update integration tests (depends on 2, 3, 4)
# 7. Remove Express dependency and cleanup
Small PRs, fast reviews
Each AI code refactoring task produces a focused merge request — typically touching 5-20 files instead of 200. Reviewers can understand the change in minutes, not hours. The Steward agent adds context about what changed and why, linking back to the overall plan.
Maximum parallelism with correct ordering
Stoneforge’s dependency system determines which tasks can run concurrently and which need to wait. Independent modules are refactored in parallel, while tasks that depend on shared code are queued until their prerequisites merge.
# Start the refactor — agents execute the plan
sf serve
# Monitor progress in real time
# Dashboard shows: 3 agents working, 2 tasks complete, 1 in review
Rollback-friendly automated refactoring
Because each task is a separate merge request, you can roll back individual changes without reverting the entire refactor. If the billing route migration introduces a bug, revert that one PR while the rest of the refactor stays in place. Combine this with AI test generation to verify each step of the refactoring process.
Related documentation
Frequently asked questions
How does AI code refactoring break down large changes?
Can automated refactoring handle shared code safely?
How do I ensure consistency across a parallelized refactor?
Can AI refactoring work across multiple packages in a monorepo?
How long does automated refactoring take compared to manual work?
Ready to get started?
Set up Stoneforge in under 30 seconds and start orchestrating AI agents in parallel.